I-N-I-T-Y and Re-Repatriation to Nyahbinghi order fundaments, trodding missions & I-deaology

 ” I N I T Y defuses Divisionally “

A reasoning on feedforward news about the the in-house discrepancies  that are eventuating in the Theocracy Reign Order of the Nyah Binghi

I-man give thanks and greetings to one & all Nyahbinghi I-drin, both Bredrin & Sistrin alike.

I-Man give I-tinual ises to our God, Man & King, His Imperial Majesty Qedamawi Haile Selassie I of Ithiopia for giving I the I-sight to forward to you my I-drin this address of the concerns of the disputes and de-stabilizing conditions I-nternationally of the roots and fundaments that make I N I Rastafarians of the Theocracy Reign Order of the Nyah Binghi.

Firstly i would like to say is that i want to present both current disagreements to the fore front of the table. Attached is excerpts from both testimonies and the respective individuals they represent so that we or rather I waan to say is I n I can look at these pieces of information and come to an accord with the aggreived parties they represent.

http://rastaites.com/news/hearticals/nyahbinghi/sizzla.pdf represented by Ras Iyah V,Ras Ivi and Sister Mitzie

Declaration by Theocracy Reign Order of the Nyah Binghi represented by Theocracy Reign Order of the Nyah Binghi Council of Ancients and associates.

As a young Nyahbinghi Rastafarian true to the faith, livication and future of Rastafari in particular to the original House, Theocracy Reign Order of the Nyah Binghi, I nah want to see a house divided with in house strife, corruption or bastardisation whatsoever form that will inevitably take place if we and i say that in a collective I N I humble way, do not stop and try to Inite in our common theology and faith.

I gwaan to see di day when I man yodd to Jamdown with i offspring and Introduce dem to ALL Nyahbinghi Rastafarians and not have to say to dem ” Ye see mi Son, Dawta, dem both Nyahbinghi but them trifle or disagree with each other, we have to stick to our side ” What happened to I N I T Y and collective reasoning with individual thought and input.

Lets also take a actual look at the defined meaning of the word “Theocracy” and what it means in all truthfulness:

Theocracy is a form of government in which a deity is officially recognized as the civil Ruler and official policy is governed by officials regarded as divinely guided, or is pursuant to the doctrine of a particular religion or religious group.

From the perspective of the theocratic government, “God himself is recognized as the head” of the state, hence the term theocracy, from the Greek θεοκρατία “rule of God”, a term used by Josephus for the kingdoms of Israel and Judah.  A theocracy may have an administrative hierarchy of the government identical with the administrative hierarchy of the religion, or it may have two ‘arms,’ but with the state administrative hierarchy subordinate to the religious hierarchy. ” In the true meaning meaning of RasTafari, separation of church or RasTafari and state does not exist inundubiously.”

Taken literally or strictly, theocracy means rule by God or gods and refers primarily to an internal “rule of the heart”, especially in its biblical application. The common, generic use of the term, as defined above in terms of rule by a church or analogous religious leadership, would be more accurately described as an ecclesiocracy.  On the contrary to what the term means the current shituation if we closely examine is that ecclesiocracy.

In a pure theocracy, the civil leader is believed to have a direct personal connection with God. For example, a prophet like Moses led the Israelites, and the prophet Muhammad ruled the early Muslims. Law proclaimed by the ruler is also considered a divine revelation, and hence the law of God. An ecclesiocracy, on the other hand, is a situation where the religious leaders assume a leading role in the state, but do not claim that they are instruments of divine revelation. For example, the prince-bishops of the European Middle Ages, where the bishop was also the temporal ruler. The papacy in the Papal States occupied a middle ground between theocracy and ecclesiocracy, since the pope did not claim he is a prophet who receives revelation from God, but merely the (in rare cases infallible) interpreter of already-received revelation. Religiously endorsed monarchies fall between these two poles, according to the relative strengths of the religious and political organs.

Theocracy should be distinguished from other, secular, forms of government that have a state religion, or are merely influenced by theological or moral concepts, and monarchies held “By the Grace of God”. In the most common usage of the term, some civil rulers are leaders of the dominant religion (e.g., the Byzantine emperor as patron of the head of the official Church); the government claims to rule on behalf of God or a higher power, as specified by the local religion, and divine approval of government institutions and laws. These characteristics apply also to a caesaropapist regime. The Byzantine Empire however was not theocratic since the patriarch answered to the emperor, not vice versa; similarly in Tudor England the crown forced the church to break away from Rome so the royal (and, especially later, parliamentary) power could assume full control of the now Anglican hierarchy and confiscate most church property and income.

Secular governments can also coexist with a state religion or delegate some aspects of civil law to religious communities. For example, in Israel marriage is governed by officially recognized religious bodies who each provide marriage services for their respected adherents, yet no form of civil marriage (free of religion, for atheists, for example) exists nor marriage by non-recognized minority religions. India similarly delegates control of marriage and some other civil matters to the religious communities, in large part as a way of accommodating its Muslim minority.

We must strive back to who we are, in accordance with one another for if we don’t, I man fear that the discrimination, prejudices and Baby-wrong propaganda would finally destroy I N I all.

And then in all eventuality we would be disgracing and dishonouring the name & existence of the truth rights and morals that His Imperial Majesty represents.

We must come to end of our dispute before we end ourselves.

I N I T Y IN AFRICA IS HAPPENING, Why not I N I Nyahbinghi Idrin.

“In the modern world, no nation, and certainly no nation which is classified among the less-developed, can hope to bring to its people the standard of living and material prosperity which it seeks for them unless its total resources are enlisted in the struggle. surely Ethiopia’s most valuable resources are her people and the intelligence, energy, devotion and ambition which they constitute and represent. It is to them that we must look for the attainment of the goals which we seek.

“Even assuming, however, that the will and the desire exist, there remains the immensely difficult and complex task of organizing the nation’s energies and resources and directing them in a well-conceived and fully integrated fashion to the achieving of carefully studied and clearly defined ends.”
quote by our God and King, H.I.M Qedamawi Haile Selassie I of Ithiopia.

Selassie I a Rise

I-Roam Ras, Theocracy Reign Order of the Nyah Binghi Aotearoa